Woops. She's probably a real Anna, too. Quite possibly an Anna Harder (though almost certainly not Schrock).
Here we go: Anna, la menonita...
[I just wanted to post that top picture, which my folks took over a year ago in Centro Menno.]
(or rather, village water)

OATMEAL PEANUT BUTTER COOKIES
2 ripe bananas1/3 cup peanut butter
2 tbsp 2% milk
1 tsp vanilla extract
2 tbsp agave nectar (I used honey)
1 large egg
2 1/2 cups quick-cooking or rolled oats
1/4 cup whole wheat flour
Handful of chocolate chips
Preheat oven to 350°F. Make banana puree by mashing the bananas with a fork until smooth. Whisk in the peanut butter, milk, vanilla, honey, and egg. Add the remaining ingredients and stir until well combined. Drop dough onto a greased cookie sheet; flatten slightly. Bake 10-15 minutes.





Do not be hectoring or arrogant. Those who disagree with you are not necessarily stupid or insane. Nobody needs to be described as silly: let your analysis show that he is. When you express opinions, do not simply make assertions. The aim is not just to tell readers what you think, but to persuade them; if you use arguments, reasoning and evidence, you may succeed. Go easy on the oughts and shoulds.
Do not be too pleased with yourself. Don't boast of your own cleverness by telling readers that you correctly predicted something or that you have a scoop. You are more likely to bore or irritate them than to impress them.
Do not be too chatty. Surprise, surprise is more irritating than informative. So is Ho, ho and, in the middle of a sentence, wait for it, etc.
And finally,The following letter from a reader may be chastening:
SIR—At times just one sentence in The Economist can give us hours of enjoyment, such as “Yet German diplomats in Belgrade failed to persuade their government that it was wrong to think that the threat of international recognition of Croatia and Slovenia would itself deter Serbia.”
During my many years as a reader of your newspaper, I have distilled two lessons about the use of our language. Firstly, it is usually easier to write a double negative than it is to interpret it. Secondly, unless the description of an event which is considered to be not without consequence includes a double or higher-order negative, then it cannot be disproven that the writer has neglected to eliminate other interpretations of the event which are not satisfactory in light of other possibly not unrelated events which might not have occurred at all.
For these reasons, I have not neglected your timely reminder that I ought not to let my subscription lapse. It certainly cannot be said that I am an unhappy reader.
—WILLARD DUNNING
Scrupulous writers will also notice that their copy is edited only lightly and is likely to be used. It may even be read.








